Re: [gtk-list] Re: Gtk-- versus GTK+
- From: Karl Nelson <kenelson ece ucdavis edu>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- cc: kenelson ece ucdavis edu
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: Gtk-- versus GTK+
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 12:39:35 -0700
Because connections between C++ objects through the gtk+
signal system are unsafe. To do this without using gtk--
you usually end up writing hundreds of little static functions
to connect you C++ objects to gtk.
If you are just using C++ as an enhanced C (just overloading and
C++ comments, but are not using class features, STL, and templates)
then you can use gtk+ without gtk-- fairly easily. Beyond that
you start rewritting the functionality of gtk--.
Additionally, some people complain that they don't like to have to
use the gtk+ system to derive a widget. Gtk-- hides that from the
user by allowing more nature C++ OO system. Also it provides some
translation features for C++ types like strings to gchar* and such.
There are many reasons for it to be a seperate package beyond that
of the gtk+.
--Karl
Gtk-- Contributor
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]