Re: [gtk-list] Re: Proposed widget
- From: KC5TJA <kc5tja topaz axisinternet com>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: Proposed widget
- Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 08:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
On 24 May 1998, Sascha Ziemann wrote:
> AmigaOS is silly gambler garbage. It does have at least any memory
> protection and I can continue the list of not existing features... But
> I really do not want to hurt your nostalgic reminders, so we should
> not continue the discussion about the Amiga. Every normal PC has 32 MB
Actually, I beg to differ. You brought it up on this list, I think you
should explain your reasoning here. Why is AmigaOS, oft considered the
most efficient OS in existance today, "silly gambler garbage" to you?
I think what we have here is a fundamental rift in how one thinks of
building software. AmigaOS tries very hard to include only the things
absolutely necessary to successfully run the computer. It's the
RISC-point of view: simpler is better. UNIX of any sort, Windows, OS/2,
et. al. tries, however, to be all-inclusive of all applications for all
users. It tries to be as COMPLETE as possible: the CISC point of view.
Then people wonder why AmigaOS runs so much faster than other
"heavy-weight" operating systems, then they get jealous and start touting,
"But it doesn't have memory protection!" TOO BAD! It doesn't NEED it!
Therefore, I ask that you have a little more open mind about AmigaOS, and
how its internals work. They are porting AmigaOS to the x86 as we speak,
and when released, I can garuntee you that it *WILL* make a big splash.
> RAM today. Is it really not acceptable to spend 10% for a full featured
> widget set?
Yes. It is truely unacceptable for me. I want my RAM and drive space for
*MY* application's data. Not a tool. Would you want to work on your own
car if the tool you need is the size of your car itself, and just as
heavy?
PS: AmigaOS is still perfectly happy on a 20MB harddrive. If you intend
on running a world-class application like VideoToaster or some of the
Amiga office suites, then you're probably looking at needing around 100MB.
Need Internet? Another 5MB. Linux, in contrast, requires 200MB for a
comparibly equipped system. Still not bad, but I thought I'd put it into
perspective.
==========================================================================
KC5TJA/6 | -| TEAM DOLPHIN |-
DM13 | Samuel A. Falvo II
QRP-L #1447 | http://www.dolphin.openprojects.net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]