Re: Pango process_modules_file () module path
- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
- To: John Ralls <jralls ceridwen fremont ca us>
- Cc: "gtk-i18n-list gnome org" <gtk-i18n-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Pango process_modules_file () module path
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:28:49 -0500
On 12-12-18 11:52 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> What can we do to make it better still? Well, I think using XDG variables instead of private ones would be an improvement. Does all of this gyrating with text files listing the modules really get us anything, or would it be less trouble to just go to the modules directory and load everything in it?
With HarfBuzz now in place, I'm thinking about completely removing the module
machinery. You know what? Lets do it. Who volunteers to rip out another
1000 lines?
Owen, any objections?
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
