Re: Documentation coverage patch.

[Damon Chaplin <damon ximian com>]

Joakim Ziegler wrote:

> > I'd prefer it if it didn't output $MODULE-symbols.txt by default, unless
> > there is a good reason. Maybe add a command-line option for that.
> 
> The only good reason I can see is that this is intended to be run
> automatically on the web server to generate a web page with the overview.
> This means it's run from the makefiles, which again means that every module
> that we monitor in this way needs to have its makefiles patched to support
> this option (unless I'm missing something fundamental here). That makes
> deploying this page a lot more work. I don't know if that's a convincing
> arugment or not.

$MODULE-symbols.txt is just a long list of symbols, though, isn't it?
What was the web server going to do with them?

Damon