Re: gdk threads ...
- From: Andy Wingo <wingo pobox com>
- To: Ryan Lortie <desrt desrt ca>
- Cc: Gtk Hackers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, michael meeks suse com, Andrew, Cowie <andrew operationaldynamics com>
- Subject: Re: gdk threads ...
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:34:58 +0100
Heya,
On Mon 05 Mar 2012 14:07, Ryan Lortie <desrt desrt ca> writes:
> On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 12:11 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> Does that mean you're removing gdk_threads_enter and leave and the
>> semantics around that ? is there some cunning new scheme proposed to
>> intercept the mainloop and ensure that events / idle / timeout emissions
>> hooked in by the toolkit can have applications add lock/unlock pairs ?
>
> We're not removing -- only deprecating.
>
> The removal will come in GTK4. There will be no replacement
> functionality -- you will just be expected to do all your interaction
> with the toolkit from the main thread (ie: dispatching results via
> idles).
You're sure this is a good idea?
I really liked Java-GNOME's approach to the issue:
http://blogs.operationaldynamics.com/andrew/software/java-gnome/thread-safety-for-java
Would this mode of interaction with GTK+ not be supported in the future?
I think I missed the original mail :)
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]