Re: [g-a-devel] Coming to grips with the state of a11y in gtk



From: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>

> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Piñeiro <apinheiro igalia com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> So probably we could study that. Anyway, in the same way, right now I
>> don't see how this would better that the option proposed by Matthias.
> 
> Oh, I think having the option of implementing the a11y interface in
> the widget itself would be great for many of the simple cases.
> For the complex widgets, we'll probably always have separate objects anyway.

Ok, lets add this option as a thing to be discussed:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642597

===
API (apinheiro igalia com)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]