Re: [g-a-devel] Coming to grips with the state of a11y in gtk

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Piñeiro <apinheiro igalia com> wrote:

> So probably we could study that. Anyway, in the same way, right now I
> don't see how this would better that the option proposed by Matthias.

Oh, I think having the option of implementing the a11y interface in
the widget itself would be great for many of the simple cases.
For the complex widgets, we'll probably always have separate objects anyway.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]