Re: [Introspection] Trying to remove warnings for Pango-1.0.gir: Boxed or skip?
- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
- To: Alberto Ruiz <aruiz gnome org>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Introspection] Trying to remove warnings for Pango-1.0.gir: Boxed or skip?
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:31:15 -0400
On 04/25/11 19:27, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I removed most warnings while generating Pango-1.0.gir, however,
> there's a last batch of warnings I'm not sure how to get rid of:
> http://pastebin.com/V0ZDRg3r
Thanks Alberto!
> I've been lurking around and all that I can gather is that some of
> those types are not present in the gir, though I'm not sure why. Any
> pointers are welcome.
I see two different cases:
- The various PangoAttr* are not boxed separately as they "subclass"
PangoAttribute without a real object system. See bug 646788 for example.
- The other cases (PangoEngineShape, etc) are protected behind
PANGO_ENABLE_ENGINE, and perhaps some behind PANGO_ENABLE_BACKEND. Those APIs
are less stable than the base API and may change between release cycles. Not
sure they are worth binding. (ie, do we support someone implementing a Pango
backend in Python? Maybe...)
behdad
> Thanks!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]