Re: XCB + deprecating gtkx.h ?

On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 08:11 -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> > I guess maybe gdkx.h could avoid including the actual xlib or xcb
> > headers, and instead use its own XID typedefs, and have some kind of
> > API to abstract Display* vs. xcb_connection_t* etc. But that's the
> > real hard part I would think.
> Here we go again. Is Gtk+ a cross-platform toolkit or is it a wrapper for X11?

gdkx.h is a X11-specific header - containing X11-specific functionality.
I fail to see the point in your comment.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]