Re: Review of gnio, round 1

["Vovo ^^" <vovozito gmail com>]

Also will it always resolve names using only DNS?

2009/5/11 Xavier Claessens <xclaesse gmail com>:
> Le lundi 11 mai 2009 à 19:26 +0200, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
>> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 10:49 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
>> > On 05/11/2009 10:30 AM, Stefan Kost wrote:
>> > > Alexander Larsson schrieb:
>> > >> GResolver is already in gio, yes. NameResolver isn't really less generic
>> > >> than GResolver though. What else would it resolve but names? Could be
>> > >> GDNSResolver though.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > > That sounds good. I was just wondering as there are other resolvers too
>> > > (SATResolver, EquationResolver, ...)
>> >
>> > But are those likely to ever be in the "G" namespace?
>> >
>> > Also, it's an interface to libresolv, so... GResolver.
>> >
>> > But anyway, we could rename it to GDNSResolver if people wanted. Or just
>> > "GDNS"?
>>
>> I personally don't think GResolver is that bad. Its unlikely that we
>> will put any other resolver in glib/gio or otherwise in the G namespace,
>> and conflicts with resolvers in other namespaces are not really a
>> problem either in C or in bindings.
>>
>> I'm not violently opposed to GDnsResolver if people point out real
>> causes for concern though.
>
> I don't like GDnsResolver for the simple reason that with such name I
> never know if the acronyme is in upper case or not... GDNSResolver VS
> GDnsResolver. :P
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>