Re: Review of gnio, round 1

On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 10:49 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
> On 05/11/2009 10:30 AM, Stefan Kost wrote:
> > Alexander Larsson schrieb:
> >> GResolver is already in gio, yes. NameResolver isn't really less generic
> >> than GResolver though. What else would it resolve but names? Could be
> >> GDNSResolver though.
> >>
> >>   
> > That sounds good. I was just wondering as there are other resolvers too
> > (SATResolver, EquationResolver, ...)
> But are those likely to ever be in the "G" namespace?
> Also, it's an interface to libresolv, so... GResolver.
> But anyway, we could rename it to GDNSResolver if people wanted. Or just
> "GDNS"?

I personally don't think GResolver is that bad. Its unlikely that we
will put any other resolver in glib/gio or otherwise in the G namespace,
and conflicts with resolvers in other namespaces are not really a
problem either in C or in bindings.

I'm not violently opposed to GDnsResolver if people point out real
causes for concern though.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]