Re: Review of gnio, round 1

[Xavier Claessens <xclaesse gmail com>]

Le lundi 11 mai 2009 à 19:26 +0200, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 10:49 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
> > On 05/11/2009 10:30 AM, Stefan Kost wrote:
> > > Alexander Larsson schrieb:
> > >> GResolver is already in gio, yes. NameResolver isn't really less generic
> > >> than GResolver though. What else would it resolve but names? Could be
> > >> GDNSResolver though.
> > >>
> > >>   
> > > That sounds good. I was just wondering as there are other resolvers too
> > > (SATResolver, EquationResolver, ...)
> > 
> > But are those likely to ever be in the "G" namespace?
> > 
> > Also, it's an interface to libresolv, so... GResolver.
> > 
> > But anyway, we could rename it to GDNSResolver if people wanted. Or just
> > "GDNS"?
> 
> I personally don't think GResolver is that bad. Its unlikely that we
> will put any other resolver in glib/gio or otherwise in the G namespace,
> and conflicts with resolvers in other namespaces are not really a
> problem either in C or in bindings.
> 
> I'm not violently opposed to GDnsResolver if people point out real
> causes for concern though.

I don't like GDnsResolver for the simple reason that with such name I
never know if the acronyme is in upper case or not... GDNSResolver VS
GDnsResolver. :P