Re: Gtk+ Font Dialog improvements
- From: Tim Evans <t evans aranz com>
- To: Henrique Carvalho Alves <hcarvalhoalves gmail com>
- Cc: usability gnome org, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gtk+ Font Dialog improvements
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:22:07 +1200
Henrique Carvalho Alves wrote:
There was discussion on this some time ago, and the discussion got lost.
I'm trying to raise interest
on this issue again.
I did a mockup for a new gtk+ font chooser, as I find the current one
lacking from usability aspects,
and wanted to gather some feedback. If there's any interest, please read
the rationale at my blog:
http://hcalves.tumblr.com/post/144502395/one-thing-i-dislike-on-gtk-its-the-current-font
The mockup is functional and implemented in Python + Glade. It's
available at my Launchpad:
https://code.launchpad.net/~hcarvalhoalves/+junk/gtkfontdialog
I would appreciate feedback from user and developer viewpoints, and
further discussion for
improving the dialog.
A few things I noticed, which may be specific to win32:
The "Typeface" list for many windows families (Verdana for example) is
"Oblique", "Normal", "Bold Oblique", "Bold". When switching to those
families Oblique is always selected. If it's going to revert to
anything when selecting a new family it should be Normal. Ideally it
should try and stay with the previous typeface selection, even switching
between Oblique and Italic depending on what's available.
The family list is by far the largest, at least on my machine, yet has
the least vertical space. Is there any way that this list could be bigger?
The common fonts list may be wrong at least for Vista. A good common
set might be:
- Calibri, already there and is the Vista default sans-serif font.
- Cambria replaces Times New Roman as the default serif font.
- Consolas replaces Courier as the default monospaced font.
- Segoe UI is the new default UI font, replacing Tahoma and Verdana.
Personal opinion, but I think these new Vista fonts are a lot better
than the older ones and users should be encouraged to use them. I guess
the older fonts could be kept in the list for backward compatibility,
ideally at the bottom of the list.
--
Tim Evans
Applied Research Associates NZ
http://www.aranz.com/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]