Re: GTK+ Website Review - Final Draft

Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 15:44 +0100, Emmanuel Briot wrote:
Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten.
I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support
perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember).

This list is not updated by anyone except us though. The problem is
that it will definitely become out of date unless someone actively
checks up on all bindings. That is probably also why the bindings on
there are mostly out of date for a lot of languages.
Speaking as one of the maintainers for the Ada binding, it is
up-to-date for gtk+ 2.8, and partially for 2.10. Should I
convey this information by some other means to maintainers ?

As I said before in this thread, the page used to have a sentence
suggesting that you tell the language-bindings list about new or changed
information. I then made those changes every few weeks. That allowed the
page to be as correct as the bindings authors wanted it to be. But
maintainership of this page has apparently been taken away from me.
Hi Murray!
I didn't know I stole editorship from anyone (I just fix stuff here and there), but I'm unaware of any kind of technical limit to how many people can edit the page. When I do changes I just fix it in svn, doesn't this work for you?
*cough*, sorry for that last part.
There is no policy (that I know of, but I'm new to this list) on who can and who cannot change stuff on the page. I think what Martyn meant was that he could fix it for you, but that it would take a bit of time before he would get around to it. You are totally free to change stuff yourself though. As long as we have a general agreement on what goes on the pages and not.
- Andreas

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]