Re: GTK+ Website Review - Final Draft

> Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten.
> I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support
> perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember).
> This list is not updated by anyone except us though. The problem is
> that it will definitely become out of date unless someone actively
> checks up on all bindings. That is probably also why the bindings on
> there are mostly out of date for a lot of languages.

Speaking as one of the maintainers for the Ada binding, it is
up-to-date for gtk+ 2.8, and partially for 2.10. Should I
convey this information by some other means to maintainers ?

thanks in advance

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]