Re: let g_warn_if_fail replace g_assert

["Brian J. Tarricone" <bjt23 cornell edu>]

Armin Burgmeier wrote:

> I think the proposal is that g_warn_if_fail() shall return (in contrast
> to g_assert(), which most of the time aborts the program), but it shall
> not return from the function calling it. g_warn_if_fail() is supposed to
> do exactly what its name implies: Just print a warning if a condition is
> not met.

Ah, gotcha, I interpreted 'returning' as making the calling function 
return.  Still, though, if g_warn_if_fail() prints a g_critical(), it 
makes more sense to me to call it g_critical_if_fail().

	-brian