Re: libglade and GObject support

[Johan Dahlin <johan gnome org>]

Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> ext Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>> I think it would be much better for everyone if we get GtkBuilder done
>> now and not evolve on libglade, my concern here is mostly based on
>> the diverse ways in which you can represent widgets in xml: libglade
>> might do it one way, GtkBuilder might want to do it another - then
>> with all kinds of glade files in circulation things will definitly
>> be harder to manage.
> 
> Agreed. About GtkBuilder, wouldn't it be a good idea to push it into 
> svn? That would give it more visibility and probably speed up its 
> inclusion in gtk+.

We're working on that. Matthias gave a half promise to do review the current
patch before the end of the week.

Johan