Re: libglade and GObject support

[Alberto Mardegan <mardy users sourceforge net>]

ext Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> I think it would be much better for everyone if we get GtkBuilder done
> now and not evolve on libglade, my concern here is mostly based on
> the diverse ways in which you can represent widgets in xml: libglade
> might do it one way, GtkBuilder might want to do it another - then
> with all kinds of glade files in circulation things will definitly
> be harder to manage.

Agreed. About GtkBuilder, wouldn't it be a good idea to push it into 
svn? That would give it more visibility and probably speed up its 
inclusion in gtk+.

Ciao,
  Alberto

--
http://www.mardy.it <-- Geek in un lingua international!