Re: VFS for legacy apps

On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 10:45 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 15:11 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:

> > Which protocols don't require a server address? Which don't require a
> > path relative to the server? If none, will such realistically exist in
> > the future?

> In gvfs currently there is smb-network (i.e. smb:///)
> In gnome-vfs there are things like computer:, network:, cdda:, burn:.
> Another example would be the remote version of file:/// (access files on
> the machine that runs the session bus as discussed earlier in this
> thread).

Good point. So I guess the protocol identifier is the only element that
can be fixed, and the rest must be option=$value.

Hans Petter

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]