Re: Reverting to non-async file chooser

On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 10:28 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:

> Federico, there is *NO* need for such changes. you've outlined your
> planned cancellation changes and gotten at least 3 replies from Kris
> and me describing:

A little while back you got several mails from me on why
GInitiallyUnowned was a bad idea, and you decided to ignore my comments.
You maintain that code, so it was your call.

In this new situation, I'll decide to ignore your comments.  I maintain
this code, so it's my call.

Now, I don't want to turn this into a pissing contest.  Instead, I'll
trust the code which has tests to ensure that it works correctly.  My
file system code has tests (it's what I've been working on for the past
week), and Kris's apparently doesn't --- so I'll trust my version.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]