Re: GtkColorPickerButton
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GtkColorPickerButton
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 16:06:57 -0500
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 02:46:40PM -0500, Jody Goldberg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 02:08:54PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> >
> > If you try to use the color combo for the gnome-panel prefs, it will
> > suck because the common case will take 6-7 steps plus some complexity,
> > instead of 3-4 simple steps.
>
> Dunno about that. Selecting a non-palette colour from the combo
> only adds 1 or 2 (depending on how you count) steps.
> Combo Selector
> - button down - button down
> - drag to custom - button release
> - button release
>
> Then the selector comes up.
If it's done as the OS X one is, where as soon as you close the dialog
the color you chose in the dialog becomes the active one for the
combo/optionmenu, then yes it doesn't add a lot of steps. I was
thinking you had to edit a palette entry, then go back and choose the
entry you edited. The OS X optionmenu doesn't really have the concept
of editing the palette.
Adding even one step is wrong if we expect 90% of the time people want
an arbitrary color instead of the presets probably, but if we expect
people usually want presets then clearly making the presets faster
would be better.
> > So based on that argument, I would include both widgets. But some
> > nice docs on when to use each wouldn't hurt.
>
> I'm not sure there is alot of utility in having distinct widgets.
> The selector is a simple specialization of the combo. The
> interfaces to get/set colour and potentially querying history should
> be identical.
Right, well that's an implementation question. I'd say we should
decide how many different UIs there are, and then we can figure out
how to write the simplest API/implementation to support that.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]