Re: po/Makefile.in.in patch for glib-2-2 branch



Owen Taylor wrote:

OK, should be fine to commit.

Done.

Just a thought ... but maybe there is some way we can make GLib's
Makefile.in.in ready-for-intltool.

If I was writing intltool today, I would probably try to make the tools argument compatible with the GNU gettext tools. That way the "patching" process could be confined to redefining some AC_SUBST's in configure.in. I don't know if doing that is feasible now or not though.

Or alternatively, intltool should install it's own po/Makefile.in.in.

This patching thing is just incredibly non-robust.
Agreed. At the moment, my main aim has been to make sure it doesn't hold up build tool updates for other packages. It is probably worth revisiting this at a later time though.

James.

--
Email: james daa com au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]