Re: po/Makefile.in.in patch for glib-2-2 branch

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 19:19, James Henstridge wrote:
> I have split out the po/Makefile.in.in changes from my previous patch, 
> for merging with the glib-2-2 branch.  This will help other packages 
> that use glib-gettextize that want to upgrade to newer automakes.  Of 
> course, the patch won't break anything for packages stil using automake 
> 1.4 (including glib 2.2).
> 
> The actual Makefile changes are identical to the ones on the head branch

OK, should be fine to commit.

> One other area of concern is packages using intltool + glib-gettextize. 
>  This isn't a problem, since yesterday I got approval and checked in a 
> patch to get intltool to work with glib 2.3's glib-gettextize.

Just a thought ... but maybe there is some way we can make GLib's
Makefile.in.in ready-for-intltool.

Or alternatively, intltool should install it's own po/Makefile.in.in.

This patching thing is just incredibly non-robust.

Regards,
                                               Owen