Re: broken accelerator changes


Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:

> shipping 2.0 without accel changing has a bunch of inaccaptable impacts that
> i'm not seeing you considering (beyond what i already mentioned):
> - some applications (the gimp, beast) will implement their own hackery to
>   enable runtime changable accels by default because their users need it
>   and are used to it. this leads to gtk+ applications behaving inconsistenly
>   and probably session/desktop wide settings to not take effect in some
>   applications.

Tim is absolutely right. We will not accept the removal of runtime
changeable accels in The GIMP. I'd also vote for changing the default
to allow accelerator changes again.

Salut, Sven

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]