Re: New 'GObject' as base for GtkObject?
- From: Guillaume Laurent <glaurent worldnet fr>
- To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: New 'GObject' as base for GtkObject?
- Date: 22 Dec 1999 00:24:11 +0100
Havoc Pennington <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Guillaume Laurent <email@example.com> writes:
> > I believe he was referring to your comment on "syntactic sugar" to
> > which I've already answered myself.
> You have not.
Yup, I'm missing the echo of my reply, so I probably mailed it with my
"other" mail id and it didn't get through since it's not among the
> My comment is that OO design and OO syntactic sugar are distinct
> concepts. My comment was not that syntactic sugar is bad or useless.
We agree then. All the better my first reply didn't get through, more
] [Thread Prev