Re: New 'GObject' as base for GtkObject?

Havoc Pennington <> writes:

> Guillaume Laurent <> writes: 
> > I believe he was referring to your comment on "syntactic sugar" to
> > which I've already answered myself. 
> You have not.

Yup, I'm missing the echo of my reply, so I probably mailed it with my
"other" mail id and it didn't get through since it's not among the
subscribers list.

> My comment is that OO design and OO syntactic sugar are distinct
> concepts. My comment was not that syntactic sugar is bad or useless.

We agree then. All the better my first reply didn't get through, more
saved electrons.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]