Re: New 'GObject' as base for GtkObject?
- From: Guillaume Laurent <glaurent worldnet fr>
- To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: New 'GObject' as base for GtkObject?
- Date: 21 Dec 1999 23:39:18 +0100
Havoc Pennington <email@example.com> writes:
> Bill Huey <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > That's a pretty "dated" comment. That's all I'll say about the issue.
> You aren't going to convince anyone that the GTK core developers are
> out-of-date idiots and you are some kind of programming genius (unless
> you maybe point us to your cool code). So why not take it off the
I believe he was referring to your comment on "syntactic sugar" to
which I've already answered myself. And while I think he's lacking
tact and missing a few issues about gtk+, I was amazed to hear you
saying something like that. It sounded like you had been adbucted by
slashdot-reading aliens and brainwashed.
] [Thread Prev