Re[3]: argv

["Andrew Robinson" <arobinson18 cox net>]

You aren't listening. I know *EXACTLY* where it should be. The only problem,
it isn't there. Why not?

On 4/16/2016 at 1:35 PM, Allin Cottrell <cottrell wfu edu> wrote:
> You should be aware of how unimpressive a performance you're putting 
> on. By your own account you have a mistaken notion of where in 
> memory your program's argument array is to be found. But apparently 
> you are lacking one or more of the curiosity, the initiative or the 
> intellectual firepower to actually investigate and solve this 
> problem. Instead you embark on endless rounds of self-justification 
> and slagging-off of those who are trying to help you.
>
> Into the bargain, you tell us "Farewell" half-a-dozen postings ago 
> then continue right on with more of the same. One of those people 
> for whom "farewell" is really just a bid for yet more attention.
>
> Allin Cottrell
>
>
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016, Andrew Robinson wrote:
>
> > Your replies are an example of exactly what I am talking about here
regarding
> > support from the Linux community. Look at the huge number of things you got
> > blatantly wrong so far [etc.]