Re: GTK win32 port: jpeg and TIFF dlls

[Ivan Baldo <ibaldo adinet com uy>]

El 11/11/07 23:22, Allin Cottrell escribiÃ:
> "In 2.12.0 I built in the loaders into the gdk-pixbuf library. 
> There are no separate loader dlls. This has the benefit that there 
> are less files in the gtk+ distribution, and there is one less 
> thing that might go wrong, as the built-in loaders don't need to 
> be listed in a gdk-pixbuf.loaders file. But ... those who use 
> gdk-pixbuf but not for jpeg or tiff images, have earlier managed 
> without the jpeg and tiff dlls...
>
> "If I get more complaints like yours, I guess I will have to 
> revert this, and build the loaders separately again."
>
> Could I put in a vote for building the loader dlls separately, as 
> before, please?  I'm sure I'm not the only one wanting to offer a 
> minimal stand-alone GTK installation to accompany my app.  It's 
> not a very big deal -- but is a bit of a pain -- to have to 
> include redundant DLLs in such a package.
>
>   
Can I vote to have the loaders separated too? Thanks!!!
Programmers should figure out how to package a GTK application on
Windows, it isn't that difficult.

Bye.

--
Ivan Baldo - ibaldo adinet com uy - http://ibaldo.codigolibre.net/
ICQ 10215364 - Phone/FAX (598) (2) 613 3223.
Caldas 1781, Malvin, Montevideo, Uruguay, South America.
We believe that we are free, but in reality we are not! Are we?
Alternatives: ibaldo codigolibre net - http://go.to/ibaldo