libglade vs. glade

[Gyözö Both <gyboth bygfoot com>]

ah, yes, i found this out, too, after browsing a bit (next time i browse
first and ask then, promise :-)). what i still don't know,
however, is what the advantages of using libglade instead of letting
glade generate the source files are -- besides having less to compile
and a smaller executable. or is this the main advantage?

and there's the disadvantage of a slower program startup, right?

gyözö

> Once you built the Glade xml file you can use the "Build code"
> function and to end with the source code built by Glade - It's what
> you're doing - or use the xml file directly through a library - called
> libglade - to build the UI from this file at runtime.
>
> > so i don't know of this
> > glade_xml_new function.
>
> You pass the xml glade file to this function to build the UI at
> runtime. GladeXML *xml = glade_xml_new("filename.glade", NULL, NULL);