Re: libglade vs. glade
- From: Gus Koppel <gtk spamkiller bytechase cx>
- To: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: libglade vs. glade
- Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:36:02 +0100
Gyözö Both wrote:
ah, yes, i found this out, too, after browsing a bit (next time i
browse first and ask then, promise :-)). what i still don't know,
however, is what the advantages of using libglade instead of letting
glade generate the source files are -- besides having less to compile
and a smaller executable. or is this the main advantage?
and there's the disadvantage of a slower program startup, right?
Right, but not necessarily program startup only. But please see
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/libglade/libglade.html
for the libglade reference, including an overview, and
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-app-devel-list/2005-January/msg00148.html
for a recent thread which thoroughly covers pros and cons of libglade
XML versus Glade created code. A number of cons against libglade can be
found in
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-app-devel-list/2005-January/msg00227.html
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]