Re: D-BUS [Re: A desktop framework/daemon]
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>, Philip Van Hoof <spamfrommailing freax org>, gnome-announce-list gnome org, desktop-devel-list gnome org, gtk-app-devel-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: D-BUS [Re: A desktop framework/daemon]
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:16:40 -0400
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:18:04AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
<quote who="Alan Cox">
Applications (on the network and/or the localhost) can then ask the
daemon to get a layer of a clipboard in the history (A clipboard can
have different layers, or targets. For example the HTML view of such a
clipboard, or the TEXT view, the PNG view or whatever format the
application desires). Because such clipboards can be binary the content
will be or UUEncoded or served as a HTTP url
Please make it talk via X properties, otherwise its yet another network
mess we don't need and another "doesnt work through firewalls" we don't
want to deal with.
Hmm, so what is your perspective on D-BUS? Anyone else have opinions on
this? It has had positive feedback from LKML, and its plans certainly align
well with what we need, and what people want to do...
We can tunnel D-BUS over X if we need to, I half-implemented it at one
point even.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]