Re: Operation options (filtering, sorting and more)



El lun, 14-03-2011 a las 17:59 +0100, Juan A. Suárez Romero escribió:
> On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 09:45 +0100, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> > The only issue with this approach is the use case in which we want a
> > declarative list of all the options supported by the source. For this
> > case, the user would need to test the source with all the options one
> > by
> > one, but oh well, it does not look like the typical use case and it is
> > not such a pain in the ass to implement either.
> > 
> 
> I think the user should be able to check what the source supports before
> doing any operation.
> 
> I do not see weird having an application where in the Search option, i
> present the user with a list of keys he use to filter the content.
> 
> For instance, if source allows filtering by "Artist", i want to show the
> user this option with an entry to fill it.
> That is why I think static would fit better.

Yes, that's a fair point. Nonetheless, as I said, apps can still test
the source to see what options are available.

Anyway, as I said, I don't have a particularly strong opinion about the
static or dynamic approach.

Iago




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]