Re: [PATCH 0/2] Synchronous versions for asynchronous functions

["Juan A. Suarez Romero" <jasuarez igalia com>]

On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 16:43 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>   I strongly recommend not prefixing async variants but rather the
> sync variants. IMHO gio got that wrong. As async api should be the
> (strongly) recommended one, doing it the gio way may very well give
> people the opposite impression (i-e that async variants are just there
> for the sake of completion). In fact some some good hackers I talked
> to got this wrong.
> 
So, do you mean prefixing those functions that are actually the not
recommended ones?

Well, it makes sense for me. And if good hackers say this is the right
approach, I'll agree with them.

	J.A.