Re: [PATCH 0/2] Synchronous versions for asynchronous functions

["Juan A. Suarez Romero" <jasuarez igalia com>]

On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 08:22 +0200, Iago Toral wrote:
> Anyway, I am not against having this either. I still don't see a very
> good point 
> for having sync versions of the APIs but I agree it should not be a
> lot of work 
> and it might be useful in some situations, even if they are not many,
> so if 
> you are willing to do this I am ok with it. 


So anyone is strongly against it, I'll add this synchronous functions.

But before continuing, are you OK with using grl_media_source_browse()
for synchronous function and grl_media_source_browse_async() for
asynchronous version?

For what I seen so far, seems the standard way is suffixing asynchronous
functions with _async() word.


If it is OK, I'll do it for all functions having both synchronous and
asynchronous versions, and also I'll update plugins and test-ui.
Nevertheless, as only the async versions are the ones that plugins must
implement, i'll keep the fields names in GrlMediaSourceClass and
GrlMetadataSourceClass as they are.


	J.A.