Re: Still Get an error on ./configure with OLE 0.2.4

["Greg Bledsoe" <gbledsoe knology net>]

HOOrahH!

Jody's solution does in fact work, and I've gained a bit more knowledge in
Gnu/Linux/Gnome. Of course, now I've got a failed dependancy on
gnome-print. Aargh!

Thanks so much for everyone's time.

Gregory S Bledsoe
Network Engineer
*nix padawan


On Fri, 24 May 2002 12:22:19 -0400, Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org> wrote :

> On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 04:14:22PM -0000, Greg Bledsoe wrote:
> > I've built all from source and not used any .rpm or other binary installer.
> You build gnome-libs from source?

Most, yes, in an effort to do things the hard way first.  I learn more that
way, as evidenced by the trouble I've had with gnumeric.  This is harder
now, but makes things easier later.  Just eccentric, I guess.
> > Also, if usr/local wasn't in the gnome-path, would I be able to run the
> > libole2-config? Would it give the expected responses?
> yes.
> Your shell has a 'PATH' variable which locates programs, it almost
> certinaly includes /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin. Hence
> libole2-config works.
>
> The command 'gnome-config' has a 'GNOME_PATH' variable which is not
> defined by default. Hence it only looks in the default location,
> probably /usr/lib.
>
> > I tried the steps you suggest below and get:
> >
> > bash: setenv: command not found
> > What am I missing?
> Sorry, setenv assumes a different type of shell.
> GNOME_PATH=/usr/local
> export GNOME_PATH
> and try again.