Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Temporary GNU GateKeeper registrations...?
- From: Malcolm Caldwell <malcolm caldwell ntu edu au>
- To: GnomeMeeting mailing list <gnomemeeting-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Temporary GNU GateKeeper registrations...?
- Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 10:16:35 +0930
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 09:21 +0200, Damien Sandras wrote:
> Le lundi 06 septembre 2004 �3:27 +0100, Chris Rankin a �it :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am running the GNU Gatekeeper on my firewall to make
> > it "H323-aware". The idea is that everyone local
> > registers with the Gatekeeper and then calls
> > whomsoever they wish, either internally or using
> > h323:a.b.c.d syntax.
> >
> > The problem arises with incoming calls. By the
> > definition of the Gatekeeper, an incoming caller needs
> > to register too before they can call someone.
I don't think this is the case. See below.
> BUT,
> > there's no reason why this incoming caller would want
> > to connect to my Gatekeeper unless calling someone on
> > my network. The rest of the time, they might even want
> > to register with other Gatekeepers. However, the
> > current GnomeMeeting assumes that you have a single
> > Gatekeeper registration that you don't want to change
> > very much.
>
> Registering to several gatekeepers at the same time is not possible with
> H.323.
Openh323 does have the notion of doing looks lrq ups to a gatekeeper you
are not registered to: there is some notation like
fred gk:somegatekeeper
Now, I am not sure if this form is supported by gnomemeeting. Craig may
be able to answer.
Of note: you don't necessarily have to be registered to a gatekeeper to
do lookups against it.
Otherwise the answer here is spot on: gnugk can act as a gateway. It
will do what you want. :)
> > Am I missing something here? Should I be using
> > something other than the GNU Gatekeeper? Am I mad to
> > think that some URL like:
> >
> > GK:<gatekeeper name>/userID
Your not mad at all - others have wanted such a thing.
> > would solve my problems, if GnomeMeeting could store
> > GateKeepers in its address book as well as users?
> >
>
>
> If you configure your gatekeeper to accept calls from unregistered
> users, it will act as a gateway.
>
> If your gatekeeper is on host rankin.net, and that Chris is registered
> to it, and that the gatekeeper accepts incoming calls from unregistered
> people then anybody can reach you using h323:chris rankin net
>
> Those URLs are storable in the address book, not in ILS though. Future
> versions (probably not 1.2) will allow users to specify their URLs when
> registering. We also plan to provide a public gatekeeper, but I lack the
> time to develop the registration system.
>
> > What do people think?
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list
> > GnomeMeeting-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list
> _______________________________________________
> GnomeMeeting-list mailing list
> GnomeMeeting-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]