> > Now again, let's imagine I can portscan the right port, then your > > approach is not different than the current situation, or at least, I > > don't see the difference. > > There is a difference, but if you can't implement it, then it is > irrelavant. > > ..deleted It is now implemented, and the port scan now happens on the right port. Unreachable people won't be registered to ILS and the port scan is done on the port mentionned in the ILS request. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\ It-Optics s.a. v_/_ GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ FOSDEM 2004: http://www.fosdem.org H.323 phone: callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=