Le lun, 21/06/2004 à 10:54 +0200, Holger Unterbrink a écrit : > < inline > > > Am Mo, den 21.06.2004 schrieb Damien Sandras um 10:12: > > Le lun, 21/06/2004 à 09:56 +0200, Kilian Krause a écrit : > > > Hi Holger, > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > Anyway, to answer to the rest: to me this looks like a 2 IP local > > > interface problem, where you cannot choose the local IP. Remember the > > > guy on the ML who had a private and public IP on his public interface > > > and was not able to choose it either. Maybe it's time GM adds an option > > > to choose its "local" IP of the interfaces. > > > > > > > That's possible to do but that wouldn't solve that kind of problems. The > > only new feature it will add is that it will prevent GM to listen for > > incoming calls on some of the interfaces/IP's. > > It would be nice to give GM an IP addr that is put into the Layer4 > headers of the packets to the other site, so that the other site > response to this IP address. But GM should still listen on the IP of the > phy. interface, or the possibilitie to define both (incoming and > outgoing IP). > But actually I thought this would be the NAT feature...? > Indeed, it is the NAT feature... But the NAT feature won't work if the IP is private (I just remembered that). > -holger > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=