Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting behind a Cisco Nat Firewall

On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 09:19, Damien Sandras wrote:
> Le mer 05/03/2003 à 16:11, Marc Williams a écrit :
> > 
> > When I suggested a GK, it wasn't to install it behind the Cisco.  That
> > would be pretty difficult since it's in the hotel.  :-)  Rather, install
> > it at his home base (wherever that is - home, office, etc.) and call it
> > there *from* his hotel.
> > 
> That wouldn't work either if he is NATted. I need to add patches to
> GnomeMeeting to support NAT penetration from the GNU GK firewall in
> order that it works.

Ok, I understand what you're saying but I don't think you can make it a
blanket statement.  Some routers can do h.323.  My Nexland, for
instance.  And I think Linksys also.  All I have to do is open up a few
ports that I tell gnugk to use and it just works.  Come to think of it,
I'm not sure that a h.323 aware router is even necessary with gnugk
since pretty much all the ports can be specified in gnugk.ini.  After it
gets past TCP 1720, all the other ports are negotiated.  As I recall...

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]