Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Again: STUN



Le lundi 20 mars 2006 à 20:23 +0100, Jan Schampera a écrit :
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:46:47 +0100
> Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com> wrote:
> 
> > If you find a way to have that working without having to add a
> > preference, then I'm all ears and ready to implement it.
> 
> That's it. There is none (unless you want to hardcode one - eeeek).
> 
> :(
> 
> But a single service can fail. Doesn't matter if it's called
> stun.ekiga.net or stun.foo.bar.
> 
> What about some secondary accessible only through the config database
> (comes near to "hardcoded", I know..).
> 

And a secondary ekiga.net in case the primary one would fail (for SIP)?
And a secondary ekiga.net for web signups?

It is unfortunately the same for all services :-/

> J.
> 
-- 
 _      Damien Sandras
(o-     
//\     Ekiga Softphone: http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_    FOSDEM 2006    : http://www.fosdem.org/
        SIP Phone      : sip:dsandras ekiga net
                         sip:600000 ekiga net




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]