Hi Jan, Am Montag, den 20.03.2006, 12:23 +0100 schrieb Jan Schampera: > I want to raise discussion about a kind of secondary STUN server again, > because this morning, our STUN was down again. not down. It's up, but having new IP. Unfortunately I cannot access shells from work, thus I only just updated it. Sorry for the inconvenience. > The behaviour of a STUN check detecting "blocked" and a STUN server not > responding is identical, so the registration to various SIP services > fail. > > I consider a "secondary STUN server", which is used when the "primary" > detected "blocked", to double-check the result as a user friendly > feature. stun.voxgratia.org is a secondary stun server. Alternatively use stun.buildserver.net and stun2.buildserver.net. ;) -- Best regards, Kilian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil