Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] [Fwd: Re: URL bugs?]

[Miguel Rodríguez <Miguel Rodriguez det uvigo es>]

El lun, 02-06-2003 a las 10:39, Damien Sandras escribió:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> It is indeed counter-intuitive... Imagine that to call 
> mymachine.com:1740, you have to write :
> - callto:mymachine.com:1740
> - OR h323:@mymachine.com:1740
> 
> The @ is the counter-intuitive part, no?
Ummm, shouldn't the right thing be:
h323://mycachine.com:1740 ?

Maybe callto: should be completely hiden, although accepted...
> 
> I'm not sure most of our users will be able to understand that :(
> 
> But I agree conforming to a RFC is better...
> 
> Le lun 02/06/2003 à 10:27, Christian Strauf a écrit :
> > Hi Damien!
> > 
> > > Are we going back to callto: as default instead of h323: ?
> > >  
> > > There is an RFC about h323:, but it looks indeed counter-intuitive...
> > I would stick with the RFC because I tend to agree with Miguel's arguments.
> > This URL's definition has to be precise. Apart from that I really can't see why
> > the h323-URL definition is counter intuitive -- it's quite clear what to put in
> > which place. And to be honest: addressing a snail mail letter is more difficult
> > than using the h323-URL -- you need to write the name, the street, the
> > apartment-#, the postcode, the city and the national code onto a letter; and
> > all in the right order, and twice, the recipient and the source! Giving 3 or 4
> > examples in the documentation should be completely sufficient to understand,
> > how to use the h323:-notation.
> > 
> > Just my 2-€-Cents.
> > Christian