Having external control panels in System settings
- From: Petko <pditchev gmail com>
- To: gnomecc-list gnome org
- Subject: Having external control panels in System settings
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:28:16 +0200
Hello , I'm Petko Ditchev , and for the purposes of this thread I'm a
casual user (given I have some programming background).
I'm writing here because I really think there's a problem with the
new direction of development for G-C-C - having all external
applications/extentions/whatever have to be approved and implemented
upstream . In short - I think that's an impossible concept for all linux
platforms .
Btw on my way here I read the thread discussing the issue in May
last year and I'll be giving some references to it.
Bare with me now - what are "System settings" ? Well ,given GNOME
is a desktop environment and it has for a platform linux systems (as
Ubuntu for ex.) , the user (I think I'm a pretty good representative for
one) uses System settings to configure various aspects of the system . I
personally expect to be able to find all the configuration tools needed
exactly there.
So here's the first point I want to make - System settings isn't a
configuration menu for GNOME , because GNOME isn't an operating system .
If you do not want to deal with anything else than GNOME settings in
this panel - you should call it "configure GNOME" or something like that
, and that would be integrated in a System settings panel.
So if there's no objections that System settings(SS from now on)
should serve the whole system - let's see what's there in the whole
system . Do you know all of the components - no you do not , kind
gentlemen . Actually there's a programmer somewhere that's coding a
system component right now , that will be released and will not show up
in G-C-C for some time because of "connection problems" (if someone's
been in the London subway - you know that "connection problems" means
bad news if you're late) . For me the beauty of the linux system is that
it has various components , which you can change and fix and do
whatever. Now the problem is that the stated principle doesn't seem
available in GCC does it?
Still the idea has apparently arisen that there should be no "crap"
in the SS . OK , we want pretty looks , we want no bugs addressed at us
from problems with third party apps . But do you think you're better
suited to deal with coding and updating Each and Every One of the
system components , than to make a unified look regardless of third
party enteries and some redirecting of bugreports ?
If you hate external control panels so badly - then just tag them as
external (it's not really elegant but they're still there until a
solution comes up to integrate them) and put them on bottom (or in a
spoler-type-menu or whatever) .
Here's a reference or two from the previous discussion:
Devs want "moving GNOME away from the "bucket of parts" model"
(paraphrasing from
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2011-May/msg00158.html) .
Well yes that would be great but it's not doable , not fully , not in
linux . Hell even GNOME is a part in the bucket that the OS is and it
depends on universal standards (and not designer permission) to run (for
some part).
Here's another reference - Dave says the OSs will ,at one point, start
coding their own control centers
(http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2011-May/msg00164.html)
. More shockingly both (probably developers) that reply don't see or
don't care that this is as step in the wrong direction for GNOME .
I put this much effort into the issue because I generally like the
GNOME project , and as it is (as far as I know) a community maintained
open source project, I believe a user should be able with common sense
to act in the development process , so that's also a test of concept .
Best regards ,
Petko Ditchev
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]