Re: Branch for 2.30?
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- Cc: Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>, Control Center List <gnomecc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Branch for 2.30?
- Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 11:23:03 +0100
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 11:23 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 09:05 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 23:58 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > >
> > > FWIW, I still didn't get an answer on what to do for:
> > > - external capplets (no way to merge those into control-center,
> > > realistically)
> >
> > There is a new library, libgnome-control-center-extension, which can be
> > used to implement a panel. I do want to revise the API here and change
> > anything that doesn't make sense.
> >
> > > - external capplets that aren't written in C
> >
> > I don't really have an answer here. If it's really important that we
> > support non-C settings panels, then we will need to look at switching to
> > a different extension approach, such as libpees.
> >
> can't we have introspection for libgnome-control-center-extension so
> that capplets not written in C can use the bindings?
That's no use if the non-C GIO extension points aren't getting loaded.
You'd need Python/Vala/whatever support in the control-center. Did we
really mean to go down that route?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]