Re: libslab plans
- From: "Scott Reeves" <sreeves novell com>
- To: "Rodrigo Moya" <rodrigo gnome-db org>, "Federico Mena Quintero" <federico novell com>
- Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Frederic Peters <fpeters gnome org>, gnomecc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: libslab plans
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:52:41 -0600
>>> On 4/30/2009 at 5:28 AM, Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 05:38 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 05:35 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
>>
>> > We can move libslab to its own repository and make both g-c-c and
>> > gnome-main-menu use it as a submodule.
>>
>> Uh... or we can make libslab a real library. Has the API changed very
>> much lately? Is there anything that keeps it from being a standalone
>> library?
>>
> from g-c-c point of view, it hasn't changed in a couple of years at
> least. And I think it hasn't changed that much from other points of
> view :-)
The API is stable, but it's not an official blessed library.
>
>> [I really want main-menu to be deprecated in favor of gnome-shell plus
>> gnome-zeitgeist... if that happens and gnome-control-center ends up
>> being the only user of libslab, well, I guess we could move the
>> repository around again.]
>>
> yeah
There is also YaST that builds against libslab
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]