Re: merging keyboard & keyboard shortcuts
- From: "Matthias Clasen" <matthias clasen gmail com>
- To: "Jared Moore" <cornflake pirate gmail com>
- Cc: gnomecc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: merging keyboard & keyboard shortcuts
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:29:06 -0400
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Jared Moore <cornflake pirate gmail com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Matthias Clasen
> <matthias clasen gmail com> wrote:
> >
> > Just because they both have keyboard in their name, is not a very good
> > reason to cram the shortcuts into the keyboard capplet.
>
> No. A good reason is that the keyboard shortcuts capplet is the only
> keyboard-related preferences that is _not_ in the keyboard capplets,
> which is inconsistent.
Thats really just the 'keyboard in the name' argument in disguise...
> I would also argue that keyboard shortcuts have much more to do with
> the keyboard than typing break does, since "typing break" is really
> more like "take a break from your entire computer", not just typing.
> So I don't see why typing break should be in the main keyboard
> preferences while keyboard shortcuts isn't. (Not that I'm advocating
> splitting out the typing break tab).
There was some talk about adding mouse gestures to the shortcuts capplet.
> As for 'cramming' - to me the Preferences menu seems much more crammed
> than the keyboard capplet (~23 items vs. 5 tabs). I would say that
> removing an entire item from the preferences menu with the only cost
> being 1 extra tab in the keyboard capplet is an overall decrease in
> clutter. :)
No, it is just moving the clutter around. The only thing that helps
against clutter is
actually removing unimportant things from the ui. But there is little
willingness to
do so...
> > Of course,
> > instead of complaining, I could just wait until the cycle completes
> > and all the tabs get broken out into individual capplets again...
> >
>
> What makes you say this? Is there a history of this happening?
Well, there is the shell-vs-individual-capplets cycle at least, which has gone
through a few rotations...
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]