Re: Shouldn't Drupal be reconsidered as CMS

[Sébastien Nicouleaud <sebastien nicouleaud gmail com>]

My fault.
You need to run "./bin/buildout" again, after doing an "svn up".

Seb

2009/5/8 Jaap A. Haitsma <jaap haitsma org>

2009/5/8 Sébastien Nicouleaud <sebastien nicouleaud gmail com>:

> The python-imaging contains no python2.4 modules (2.5/2.6 only):
>
> $ dpkg -L python-imaging | grep python2.4 | wc -l
> 0
> $ dpkg -L python-imaging | grep -E 'python2.5|python2.6' | wc -l
> 178
> $
>

I've got all necessary packages installed and just did an "svn up"

I think I run into the issue that python-imaging does not have 2.4 modules

Any ideas

Jaap

>
>
> 2009/5/8 Sébastien Nicouleaud <sebastien nicouleaud gmail com>
>>
>> I ran into the same issue.
>>
>> I added a PIL dependency in buildout.cfg:
>> http://dev.plone.org/collective/changeset/85732
>>
>> You just need to "svn up".
>>
>> Seb
>>
>>
>> 2009/5/8 Jaap A. Haitsma <jaap haitsma org>
>>>
>>> I'm trying this on Ubuntu Jaunty but
>>>
>>> ./bin/instance run src/wgo.installsite/wgo/installsite/installsite.py
>>>
>>> returns an error that I have: "No module named PIL"
>>>
>>> I've installed python-imaging and python2.4 but Jaunty by default uses
>>> python2.6
>>>
>>> Any ideas on how to solve this
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Jaap
>>>
>>> 2009/5/8 Davi Lima <davi infonet com br>:
>>> > I followed this link directions and it was fine:
>>> >
>>> > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/CmsSetup#head-eaedb971ca574848ff39be8f3fc10d22c3c535d5
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Davi Lima
>>> >
>>> > 2009/5/8 Jaap A. Haitsma <jaap haitsma org>
>>> >>
>>> >> OK, my apologies for bringing it up.When there are good instructions
>>> >> on how to setup a good test environment I'll be interested in trying
>>> >> to help a bit.
>>> >>
>>> >> Jaap
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 16:42, Lefty (石? ) <lefty shugendo org> wrote:
>>> >> > On 5/8/09 2:44 AM, "Andreas Nilsson" <nisses mail home se> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Talking CMS choices are one of those things that are just going to
>>> >> >> end
>>> >> >> up in a really long and boring thread without any real consensus.
>>> >> >> What
>>> >> >> I
>>> >> >> would like for us to focus on first is to get all the organization,
>>> >> >> content and design together and get it really, really good. Then we
>>> >> >> can
>>> >> >> implement that in whatever thing suits best.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I'd have to agree with Andreas that this is an unprofitable way to
>>> >> > approach
>>> >> > the discussion. There are better and worse kinds of hammers, but
>>> >> > they
>>> >> > can
>>> >> > all pretty much be used to drive nails, and talking about the
>>> >> > relative
>>> >> > merits of the various hammers won't get any nails driven.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Changing tools will not cause work which hasn't gotten done so far
>>> >> > to
>>> >> > magically become accomplished independently of someone's sitting
>>> >> > down
>>> >> > and
>>> >> > doing it. My favorite flute instruction book has this advice on the
>>> >> > first
>>> >> > page, in large letters: "MERE POSSESSION OF THIS BOOK IS _NOT_
>>> >> > SUFFICIENT."
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> gnome-web-list mailing list
>>> >> gnome-web-list gnome org
>>> >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > gnome-web-list mailing list
>>> > gnome-web-list gnome org
>>> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
>>> >
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gnome-web-list mailing list
>>> gnome-web-list gnome org
>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
>>
>
>