Re: Tuning the GNOME Product template/page



We have several issues to solve in GNOME Products:

- The structure of pages under GNOME Products.
- The product page functionality/layout/content
- The pages withy listings
- The things I will find once I scan the previous points.  ;)

I think it's better to start new threads for each "chapter". I'lkl be
back in a minute (or two) with the structure of pages.


On 2/27/07, Simone Deponti <shywolf9982 gmail com> wrote:
Okay, I'm gonna be serious now. I agree with Quim that the Products page
needs a heavy make-up, but I knew it would. What I'm more concerned about is
functionality: the look part shouldn't be hard.

Speaking of the look part, I think we should need to fix the following
"visual bugs" (not really bugs, more... underimplementation) that actually
are present in wgo. I made up this little list by taking Mairin's mockup and
putting it side to side with my Firefox window.

1. Upper black bar: notice how the thin vertical line beside "Home" is much
more long than the one beside "News". That is a bug I thought I have solved
at one time, and is because the line is applied as background to the <li>,
and they don't have the correct height (and their background so starts at
the wrong height and gets cut after a few pixels)
2. Tabs: they need to be bigger. Bigger font, more padding in all the
directions (the text is getting claustrophobic in there). Also, the template
already gives the correct "active" class to tabs, and the CSS doesn't
implement it (I love how the link color gets blue on the active tab in
Mairin mockup). Needs to be fixed
3. The tertiary navigation bar: looked bigger and shinier in Mairin's
mockup. Here, I fear we will have to give up on bigger since we're already
low on screen real estate but, I guess we can do something on the shiny
front. And here too, we miss the active spot CSS integration.
4. Last, that slightly vanishing grey background under the tertiary nav just
goes down a little too much, if you compare the proportions with those in
Mairin's mockups. It also goes under the content, where it generates a funny
effect (part of it gets superseded by the white background of the content)

Note, I am not criticizing anyone's work here (cause if we look at the code
I wrote for PloneSoftwareCenter, I better shut up). Just doing a comparison
(okay, I know we can't be pixel identical, but still..). And in my opinion,
our implementation loses 60% of Mairin's mockup visual impact.

I'm willing to take up task 1 and get it done asap, and after that, well,
we'll see ;).

I'm eager to hear opinions and why not, help offers :P.

Good night everyone

PS Mairin, I know I horribly misspelled your name throughout this mail. I'm
sorry. As excuse, I can say I just can't find that i with an open accent on
an italian keyboard. Apparently here in Italy we abhor such characters.



--
Simone Deponti
-------------------------------------------
- Oh wait, which ones are we Linux guys again, Rebels or Empire?
- Microsoft is the Empire. Apple is the Rebels. We are the Ewoks.


--
Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]