Re: Content Licenses on WGO

["Andy Tai" <atai atai org>]

Dual license under the GFDL and the CreativeCommon so maximum  reusability can be reached.

On 11/1/06, Quim Gil < qgil desdeamericaconamor org> wrote:

We need a default license for wgo. Any recommendation?

I guess the first decision is if we go for GFDL or one of the
CreativeCommons family.

I have no strong opinion. Anyone?

On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 19:54 +0100, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
> The license issue should be raised for all content on *.gnome.org. I
> think it is possible to have a mix of licenses but the CMS must help
> the user to select a license (otherwise there should be a default
> one). This would allow us and others to exchange content with
> Wikipedia or other documentation projects .Not with OpenOffice.org or
> fedoraproject.org though because they choose some kind of minority
> licenses: PDL and OPL. Thats why I would rather prefer GFDL or one of
> the Creative Commons licenses.

--
Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org


_______________________________________________
gnome-web-list mailing list
gnome-web-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list

-- 
Andy Tai, atai atai org