We need a default license for wgo. Any recommendation? I guess the first decision is if we go for GFDL or one of the CreativeCommons family. I have no strong opinion. Anyone? On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 19:54 +0100, Thilo Pfennig wrote: > The license issue should be raised for all content on *.gnome.org. I > think it is possible to have a mix of licenses but the CMS must help > the user to select a license (otherwise there should be a default > one). This would allow us and others to exchange content with > Wikipedia or other documentation projects .Not with OpenOffice.org or > fedoraproject.org though because they choose some kind of minority > licenses: PDL and OPL. Thats why I would rather prefer GFDL or one of > the Creative Commons licenses. -- Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part